DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1t S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TUR
Docket No: 2107-14
23 March 2015
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 © -
March 2015. The names and votes of the members of ‘the panel will
be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of |
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations,
and policies.
You enlisted in the Navy, began a period of active duty on 21
December 1992, and served without disciplinary incident until 26
October 1993, when you received nonjudicial punishment for -
underage drinking, drunk and disorderly conduct, and
disobedience.
misconduct. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed
separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of
misconduct and on 20 February 1996
target of racism. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these
factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case
because of the seriousness of your repetitive misconduct which
resulted in NJP and SPCM. Further, the Board noted that there
was no evidence in the record to support your assertion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
; favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
“evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. In this .
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.
Sincerely
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2254 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on;,the applicant to-démonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3822 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. In making this decision, the Board substantially concurred with NDRB’s reasoning when they upgraded your discharge to a General discharge vice Honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1187 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in your case, given your pattern of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2137 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1807 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1725 14
A three-member panel, of the Board far Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3597 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 2 March 1993, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2396 14
A’ three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR841 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Cc 1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. Shortly thereafter, after waiving your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and present your case to an administrative discharge board, your commanding officer recommended separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse/use. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1931 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2015. separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...